Skip to content

Research Stage

Public syllabus for 2025-2026

Back to syllabi

Academic overview

Programme
AIDC
Period
Year 1, Semester 2
Credits
6
Weeks
14

Curriculum placement

Appears in study plans

AIDC (2025 - 2027) Year 1, Semester 2 Mandatory subject

Teaching team

Course coordinator
(none)
Seminar coordinators
Mircea Marin

Learning time distribution

Total
Curriculum Lecture Practice Total Weekly Lecture Practice
28 0 28 2 0 2
Exam hours
2
Individual Study Bibliography study Field study Homework Tutoring Others
120 36 36 36 12 0
Overall
150

Learning outcomes

Knowledge

  • Acquire the knowledge necessary to handle a research activity
  • Apply the knowledge about research activities to the master dissertation
  • thesis

Skills

  • Ability to collect and prepare a synthesis of relevant bibliographical resources
  • professional competencies
  • Ability to prepare and conduct a research plan
  • Transversal competencies
  • Ability to prepare a report
  • Ability to prepare and deliver a presentation

Responsibility

(none)

Online platform

Classroom, class code qt3j6tnz

Course content

Content Methods Obs
- - -

Course bibliography

(none)

Seminar content

Content Methods Obs
#1-3: General presentation of this study programme; research directions of our department members; What is research? Towards innovative thinking. From existing results to new results. Documentation Presentation, Conversation, Examples Materials of the web site https://staff.fmi.uvt.ro/~dana.petcu/seminar.htm
#4-5. How to write a scientific paper. State-of-the-art analysis, systematic reviews, bibliographic researches Presentation, Conversation, Examples Materials of the web site https://staff.fmi.uvt.ro/~dana.petcu/seminar.htm
#6-7. Tools for scientific texts: scientific styles, developing high quality figures, bibliography tools Presentation, Conversation, Examples Materials of the web site https://staff.fmi.uvt.ro/~dana.petcu/seminar.htm
#8-9: Developing the state-of-the-art in a specific domain//systematic reviews/bibliographic studies. Presentation, Conversation, Examples Materials of the web site https://staff.fmi.uvt.ro/~dana.petcu/seminar.htm
#10-11: Preparing quality presentations Presentation, Conversation, Examples Materials of the web site https://staff.fmi.uvt.ro/~dana.petcu/seminar.htm
#12: Critical analysis. Peer-reviewing. Presentation, Conversation, Examples Materials of the web site https://staff.fmi.uvt.ro/~dana.petcu/seminar.htm
#13-14: Presentation of the state-of-the-art report Presentation -
Bibliography: C.C. Gaither, Alma E Cavazos-Gaither, Scientifically Speaking: A Dictionary of Quotations, 2nd Edition, Taylor & Francis, 2000 Sinclair Goodlad, c - A Handbook for Scientists, Engineers and Physicians on How to Improve Technical Presentations, Imperial College Press, 1996 Martha Davis, Scientific Papers and Presentations, Second Edition, Elsevier, 2004 Michael J. Katz, From Research to Manuscript: A Guide to Scientific Writing, Springer, 2006 Jennifer Peat, Elizabeth Elliott, Louise Baur, Victoria Keena, Scientific Writing: Easy When You Know How, BMJ Books, 2002 Jean-Luc Lebrun, Scientific Writing: A Reader and Writer's Guide, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2007 Michael Alley, The Craft of Scientific Presentations : Critical Steps to Succeed and Critical Errors to Avoid, Springer, 2007 Ann M. Koerner, Guide to Publishing a Scientific Paper, Bioscript Press, 2004 Philip Rubens, Science and Technical Writing: A Manual of Style, Second Edition, Routledge, 2000 Robert A. Day , Barbara Gastel, How to Write & Publish a Scientific Paper, 6th Edition, Greenwood Press, 2006 Rita S. Brause, Writing Your Doctoral Dissertation: Invisible Rules for Success, Routledge, 2005 Justin Zobel, Writing for Computer Science, Springer, 2004 William E. Russey, Hans Friedrich Ebel, Claus Bliefert, How to Write a Successful Science Thesis: The Concise Guide for Students, Wiley, 2006 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Seminar bibliography

(none)

Corroboration

(none)

AI tools guidance

The usage of generative AI tools is accepted, but it should be acknowledged.

Evaluation and delivery

Activity Criteria Methods Percentage
C
  • -
  • -
S
  • The students should prepare
  • during the semester:
  • 1. A research plan
  • 2. A report containing a
  • state of the art in the
  • research field they choose
  • 3. A relevant and up to date
  • bibliography
  • Oral examination
  • 50.0%

Performance standards

General understanding of a research activity

Additional info

(none)